Guidance for PV project developers in Germany
Ministry publishes guidelines on minimum nature conservation criteria
August 22, 2024
Guidance for PV project developers in GermanyMinistry publishes guidelines on minimum nature conservation criteriaAugust 22, 2024 Why should I read this?“Solar Package I”, which entered into force in May 2024 (see our previous client briefing), has introduced minimum nature conservation criteria for ground-mounted PV installations benefitting from financial support under the German Renewable Energies Act (Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz – EEG). Such projects shall comply with at least three of the following five requirements:
Project developers have been waiting for guidance on the interpretation of these criteria. The German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action has now published relevant guidelines (Naturschutzfachliche Mindestkriterien bei PV-Freiflächenanlagen (bmwk.de). It can be expected that, despite their non-binding character, these guidelines will considered by both project developers and grid operators when it comes to the implementation of the minimum nature conservation requirements. This article summarises the key aspects of the Ministry’s paper. What do I need to know?Specification of the individual criteria The guidelines specify each nature conservation criterion and list examples of suitable evidence. In detail as follows:
The maximum floor area taken up by the modules may not exceed 60% of the total area of the overall project. The total area is defined as the area enclosed to the outside by fences, hedges or a comparable boundary. This includes
When determining the 60% value, only the area covered by modules is relevant. Evidence of compliance may be provided via an adopted development plan or building permit with corresponding requirements, or other official documents/records.
The biodiversity-promoting care concept is intended to lead to an ecological improvement of the soil under the PV system. “The soil under the PV system” refers to all areas covered or built on with technical facilities in the meaning of the first criterion. The plant operator is free to decide whether the area under the PV system, in order to promote biodiversity, is mowed or grazed. Besides an adopted development plan or building permit with corresponding care measures, compliance may be proved via contracts between plant operators and contractors for mowing or grazing, corresponding invoices, or photo documentation.
In order to ensure accessibility for animal species, operators of plants with a side length of more than 500 meters must install trail corridors for large mammals whose width and planting adhere to the local conditions. The width of the corridors should generally not exceed 20 meters. It can be assumed that the corridors take account of local conditions if they have been determined by the competent nature conservation authority or by an environmental expert and are based on the needs of locally occurring and migrating large mammals. The Ministry assumes that operators of facilities with a side length of less than 500 meters can also fulfil the minimum criterion by merely ensuring passing options for smaller animal. This is considered to be guaranteed if the area is demarcated by a hedge, or not fenced at all. In order to provide evidence of compliance, plant operators may submit an adopted development plan or building permit with corresponding requirements, a documentation of the environmental construction supervision during the construction phase of the plant which contains a corresponding confirmation of compliance, or any other suitable official document or record.
Biotope elements are, in particular, elements that are typical of the area concerned, such as but not limited to native shrubs and hedges, sowing of regional seeds, areas of bare soil, sand or gravel with little vegetation, small bodies of water and nesting aids for birds, bats or insects. The plant operator may create the biotope elements on the project area, on directly adjacent areas, or on a combination of these areas. Biotope elements that were already present on the project area before the construction of the plant can also be taken into account. Compliance can be proven in the same way as accessibility for animal species, or by biotope mapping or photo documentation.
The PV system is operated in a soil-friendly way if no pesticides or fertilisers are used on the area and the system is only cleaned with cleaning products if these are biodegradable and cleaning is not possible otherwise. Since compliance is difficult to prove if the area has previously been contaminated, the plant operator is free to survey the contamination of the area before the start of construction and to provide the network operator with the initial status report. Project developers may again submit an adopted development plan or building permit with corresponding requirements, or carry out a pollutant analysis of soil or plant samples. Monitoring by the grid operators The EEG specifies the dates on which plant operators must declare compliance with the minimum nature conservation criteria. This will be monitored by the grid operators who have to verify the plausibility of the evidence submitted. They will assess whether the evidence is suitable in the individual case to demonstrate that the respective criterion is fulfilled. In general, one-off inspection at the time of commissioning is sufficient. Proof of the second and fifth criterion additionally requires an updated self-declaration at the end of every fifth year following commissioning. What should I do next?In order to benefit from financial support under the EEG, operators of ground-mounted PV plants have to fulfil at least three of the five criteria. Project developers therefore are well advised to familiarise themselves with the new requirements and the tools of evidence in a timely manner. It is to be noted, however, that the nature conservation criteria do not apply to special ground-mounted PV plants such as agricultural PV, moorland PV, car park PV and floating PV which are subject to a new, separate tender schemes. Insofar as the German Federal Network Agency makes use of its right to specify the nature conservation criteria in accordance with the EEG, this specification is legally binding and must be observed. Key contacts
Dr. Martin Weitenberg Partner Dusseldorf, Germany Dr. Silke Gantzckow, LL.M (Canterbury) Partner Frankfurt, Germany Isabel Miriam Strecker Partner Dusseldorf, Germany Dr. Arndt Scheffler Counsel Munich, Germany Laura Gerdes Senior Associate Dusseldorf, Germany Joel-Fiete Feld Senior Associate Dusseldorf, Germany Dr. Daniel Giese Senior Associate Dusseldorf, Germany Latest Insights
Latest News
Latest Events
legal updates June 03, 2026 UK Government confirms refinements to CfD allocation round 8 legal updates June 03, 2026 Global Life Sciences & Healthcare Bulletin legal updates June 02, 2026 Employer contributions to the Teachers' Pension Scheme (TPS) set to ease fo... legal updates June 02, 2026 UK Retail Finance Horizon Scanner - May 2026 client news June 02, 2026 Next stop, public ownership: Eversheds Sutherland advises DfT on GTR transi... firm news June 01, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland strengthens restructuring offering with senior partner... firm news June 01, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland strengthens Commercial Advisory practice with technolo... client news May 28, 2026 Eversheds Sutherland advises Schroders Greencoat on acquisition of Dutch bi... virtual Education Webinar - Legal refresher for education institutions – governance... June 04, 2026 11:00AM - 12:00PM virtual UK employment law training June 09, 2026 1pm - 4pm (BST) Virtual virtual Education Webinar - Occupational Stress : Preventing Suffering, Enhancing W... June 10, 2026 11:00AM - 12:00PM virtual Nordic (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) employment law training June 16, 2026 12.45pm - 4pm (BST) Virtual |