At Least One in Three US Companies Unprepared to Tackle National Security Compliance Risks, Eversheds Sutherland Report Finds
C-suite executives and in-house legal counsel split on risk strategies and compliance ownership
October 01, 2025
At Least One in Three US Companies Unprepared to Tackle National Security Compliance Risks, Eversheds Sutherland Report FindsC-suite executives and in-house legal counsel split on risk strategies and compliance ownershipOctober 01, 2025 WASHINGTON | A third or more of US companies are not fully prepared to address key national security compliance risks facing their organizations despite the notable legal, financial and operational consequences, according to Eversheds Sutherland’s 2025 US National Security Compliance Risk and Readiness Report. Nearly a quarter of the national security compliance professionals surveyed cannot fully articulate their company’s national security risk profile, potentially complicating efforts to prioritize resources. These critical preparedness gaps come at a time when US companies are facing a rapidly evolving national security compliance landscape shaped by conflict, global trade disputes, intense competition over advanced technologies, and relentless cyberattacks. To gauge the most urgent challenges and how companies are responding, Eversheds Sutherland in May and June 2025 surveyed more than 100 executives and in-house legal leaders involved in national security compliance at US-based companies across industries including financial services; industrial and manufacturing; financial institutions; technology, media and telecoms; logistics and transportation; life sciences and healthcare; aerospace and defense; consumer; and energy. Respondent organizations ranged from less than $100 million in annual revenue to more than $10 billion, with nearly half between $100 million to $999 million. The findings reveal critical gaps in both preparedness and alignment among key decision makers on compliance issues such as cybersecurity and data protection, fraud prevention, sanctions and export controls, and supply chain security. Executives and in-house counsel have notably different perspectives on risk management tactics, and which functions have ownership over national security compliance, with each claiming their function holds primary responsibility. “Our survey shows that national security compliance is growing increasingly complex as the stakes get ever higher for US companies,” said E. Patrick Gilman, Global Co-Head of National Security Investigations and Global Co-Head Aerospace, Defense and Security at Eversheds Sutherland. “In this climate, it’s critical that leaders invest in proactive compliance and cross-functional risk management efforts to protect their businesses for whatever comes next.” Other key findings from the survey report include:
“National security compliance is increasingly becoming a board-level concern, as the consequences of missteps continue to rapidly escalate” said Michael Bahar, Co-Head of Global Litigation and Co-Lead of Global Data Privacy, Security and Technology. “Critically, however, getting it right can enable greater innovation and larger global market share.” Latest NewsLatest Events
|