GenAI and the Ethical Lawyer: Same Standards, Different Dilemmas — Part II

This image features a close-up of a laptop keyboard and screen displaying an illuminated, colorful abstract design. The blue ambient lighting creates a high-tech atmosphere, perfect for illustrating the intersection of legal and technology industries, emphasizing themes of digital transformation, innovation, and modern legal solutions.This image features a close-up of a laptop keyboard and screen displaying an illuminated, colorful abstract design. The blue ambient lighting creates a high-tech atmosphere, perfect for illustrating the intersection of legal and technology industries, emphasizing themes of digital transformation, innovation, and modern legal solutions.

GenAI and the Ethical Lawyer: Same Standards, Different Dilemmas — Part II

How Courts Are Enforcing the Duty of Candor

March 10, 2026

United States
United States
United States

In Part I of “GenAI and the Ethical Lawyer,” published by the ABA Litigation Section, Eversheds Sutherland Partner Amy Rudolph discussed the ethical implications of using Generative AI (GenAI) in the legal profession, focusing on the lawyer’s duty of competence under ABA Model Rule 1.1 and outlining key risks attorneys should evaluate before using GenAI tools in legal practice.

In the newly published Part II, Ms. Rudolph turns to another critical emerging issue: the risk of lawyers relying on GenAI-generated content that includes hallucinated, or entirely fictitious, cases and quotations in court filings, and how this risk implicates a lawyer’s ethical duty of candor to the court. She explores recent orders imposing sanctions for hallucinated citations and offers strategies for risk mitigation.

The materials on the Eversheds Sutherland website are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. While reasonable care is taken to ensure accuracy, the materials may not reflect the most current legal developments. Eversheds Sutherland disclaims liability for actions taken based on the materials. Always consult a qualified lawyer for specific legal matters. To view the full disclaimer, see our Terms and Conditions or Disclaimer section in the footer.

Services

Business Topics

Key contacts

amyrudolph@eversheds-sutherland.com

Amelia Toy Rudolph

Partner

Atlanta, United States

Latest Insights

Latest News

Latest Events

  • virtual | June 09, 2026
  • virtual | June 16, 2026
  • virtual | June 23, 2026
  • virtual | September 10, 2026
Generic building in front of sun (1)

legal updates

June 03, 2026

Global Life Sciences & Healthcare Bulletin

shopping district

legal updates

May 29, 2026

Consumer Lens - Session 1 | The Rise of European Class Actions

Business meeting close up discussing data

podcasts and webcasts

May 29, 2026

Tax NOLs in Cross-Border Structures Webinar

Pay-Transparency-Waterdroplets-on-glass

legal updates

May 28, 2026

EU Pay Transparency Directive

© Eversheds Sutherland 2026. All rights reserved. Eversheds Sutherland is a provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information about these entities and Eversheds Sutherlands' structure please see the Legal Notice page of this website.

Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed or affiliated firms and the members of Eversheds Sutherland (Europe) Limited and Eversheds Sutherland (Africa) Limited (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Eversheds Sutherland Entities are in a partnership or are part of a global entity. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client. For further information about these Eversheds Sutherland Entities and Eversheds Sutherlands’ structure please see the Legal Notices page of this website. For information on Konexo please also see the Legal Notices page of this website.